Technology for Technology’s Sake?

As Jane Ryland, President Emerita, CAUSE, Boulder, CO, says, “technology should not drive the strategic direction for any college. Rather, technology should be assessed with regard to its potential for helping achieve a college’s strategic goals.” (Ryland, 2017). In other words, educators should look to the available technology to facilitate and become part of their learning activities. That being said, sometimes we have no real choice. For example, my college, Delaware Tech, uses the Blackboard Learning Management System (Blackboard) as our equivalent of a virtual learning environment. I have spent the last five years getting used to its little quirks and now the talk is that we’re going to replace it with a shiny new, as yet unnamed, modern system. The learning curve stretches upwards again for me and my students.
Most schools and colleges have built-in systems that we don’t even notice until they stop working or are replaced. This type of technology is almost invisible and is taken for granted by frequent users. I am certainly guilty of assuming that my students were born knowing how to use Blackboard, a mistake I don’t intend to make as I introduce new technologies into my lessons – virtual or otherwise.
What Does this Button Do?
All of my classes
involve Blackboard to some extent. I use
it to store my course materials, policies, schedules, web links, and many other
educational artifacts. Most of my
quizzes and other assessments are hosted on Pearson’s Mastering Anatomy and
Physiology website – another virtual classroom used by all our BIO 120 and BIO
121 Anatomy and Physiology courses.
While 95% of my students are technology enabled, the remaining 5% are
not and are in real need of a software upgrade!
Although the number of students who are technology novices is dwindling,
those who lack technology skills are at a significant disadvantage when they
are first exposed to online systems like Blackboard. Fear of breaking the
system because of an incorrect keystroke still exists in some students. Fortunately, Delaware Tech is set up to help technology novices with various
beginners’ courses and help centers. I
also encourage my students to find study buddies and exchange contact details
with fellow students, plus I’m always there to help.

The Changing Face of Teaching
(Economics Teacher. 2009)
I think that many great teachers fear
that they will lose some of their identity and self-esteem if they let
technology take over (Moore, 2007). However, if given a chance, the introduction
of technology-based active and group learning activities can help educators
realize that such activities have a genuine
educational value that will actually bolster their self-esteem (Moore, 2007).
Technology: A Personal Progress Report
When I started at Delaware Tech I decided to follow the technology yellow brick road, albeit in a
careful baby steps sort of way. The
first thing I did was to see what courses Delaware Tech had to offer – plenty
was the answer. Delaware Tech has a Center for Creative and Instructional
Technology (CCIT) and it offers a Certificate in Instructional Design and
Technology upon completion of a 15 credit course (Instructional Technology, 2017). A
salary lane-change goes along with the certificate – obviously, this was of no
interest to me! Here is a list of the
courses that I have completed or am about to complete:
- Teaching with Technology
- Foundational Technologies
- Advanced Classroom Technology
- ePortfolio Design
- Designing a Flipped Classroom

Be Careful Out There
One of the first active learning group games I introduced is called Anatomy Buzz Groups involving groups researching and reporting (teaching) about topics such as bones of the body. Although this wasn’t strictly technology-based, the students were encouraged to use the internet for research purposes. I am still developing my skills but I now include a Quizlet (Quizlet.com) area for each unit of my anatomy and physiology courses. These study areas are aimed at bolstering my students’ skills when they are studying for their summative unit exams. I use Quizlet because it can generate several assessment activities based on existing information in the system or on information added by the instructor. Analytics are provided to help build a picture of individual students’ levels of success. Quizlet provides instant feedback to the students and the games/assessments can be repeated as needed. With each repetition, students build on their knowledge and understanding of the course materials that form the knowledge base for the Quizlet questions.

I also use EDpuzzle (edpuzzle.com) an app that allows instructors to repurpose any video to include prompts and questions based on the content. Student answers are graded by the system with analytics and feedback being made available to the instructor. I like this form of assessment because it is fun for the student and because of the 24/7 feedback that is available to the instructor.
As both the Quizlet and EDpuzzle activities are created by the instructor, students have ample opportunities to work together on content that is tailored to their course and its specific requirements. Both EDPuzzle and Quizlet are also ideal for formative assessments and flipped classroom activities.
Ethical Dilemmas
I have a few reservations regarding the ethical use of both of these tools. With Quizlet, it is easy to search for and use Quizlet sets that have been created by others. However, it doesn’t seem possible to credit the people who produced the work in the first place. With EDpuzzle, YouTube videos are used as the primary video source for the repurposing. Again, there doesn’t seem to be a simple method of crediting the producers of the work. I’m not even sure if the producers have to be credited, hence my ethical dilemma.
I mentioned technology overload in my first blog and the same thing applies here, along with technology fatigue. The best advice I had about introducing technology-based activities such as flipping the classroom was to flip a class and not a course. For one thing, I simply do not have the time to develop new materials an entire course. But, if I did have the time, I wouldn’t do it because it could cause my students to develop technology fatigue as the new becomes old and boring. Also, I suspect that courses would take twice as long to complete.
How do I know that this Thing Actually Works?

- Student feedback: Do the students think that they have benefitted and/or enjoyed the experience?
- Student assessment: Do these activities lead to a better understanding of the topic in question? Formative assessments will help here.
- Application feedback: Can you, as a teacher, access your student’s usage records?
- How much does it cost to use the app and can teachers get a discount or is it possible for a school to pay for a site license?
- Does it fit the schedule: How long will it take to access and use these activities?
- Ease of preparation: Does it take a lot of time to prepare in return for little benefit?
- Software support: Is the software or website still supported, in other words, will it be there next week when you want to use it?

- Is the technology being used “Just because it’s there”?
- Is the technology allowing the teacher/students to do Old things in Old ways?
- Is the technology allowing the teacher/students to do Old things in New ways?
- Is the technology creating new and different learning experiences for the students?
We should be aiming to give our students transformative experiences, but sometimes a change is as good as a rest.
Where to Now?
Keeping
up with new developments is my main aim for the next year or two. It’s a daunting undertaking looking for the
good stuff and rejecting the bad. I just
hope that I don’t miss a gem, but you’ll let me know – won’t you?
I'm on my second year of tightly integrating technology into my classroom. I'd like to think that I'm confident in how I've decided to implement technology, but your post made me question my actions. This is a really great post for encouraging others to reflect on how they've been using technology in their instruction. You obviously reflected a lot while writing this. Great post!
ReplyDeleteHi, Drew. One of the benefits of being old (perhaps the only benefit) is experience. I can remember being in a staff development meeting in my old college in the UK. It must have been around 1996, and we were being addressed by a visiting speaker who was dressed in, what was then, very trendy shades of beige. He was wearing a collarless shirt that made him appear to be extra cool. He came out with the phrase, “If it ain’t broke, break it”. This sent my irritation level to beyond stratospheric! Why, why, why would I spend hours and hours on my time recreating something that was working demonstrably well? Technology is great, I love it, I grew up with it, and I cannot stop myself from buying it. But I want technology to work for me.
DeleteStephen
I like how you mentioned the ethical dilemmas that can arise when considering the use of technology. Too often, I see educators lacking experience with technology and simply using it because it is there. For instance, assigning online assessments to students using website created content. Don't get me wrong, there is value in the website created content. However, I have found that even that material needs to be reviewed before it gets assigned to the students. One example of this is when I observed a teacher who had assigned an online math assessment for fractions. The students had been taught how to add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators. The "Fraction Assessment", that had been assigned, contained problems requiring students to interact with mixed numbers and improper fractions. Though applicable, these skills had not yet been taught in the classroom. It became "Just try your best" when students showed confusion about these types of problems. As it turned out, the assessment data was not a reliable indicator of their mastery of the instruction they had received.
ReplyDeleteHi, Panayi,
DeleteYes! I have been guilty of using other people’s Quizlet sets without spending the time to make sure that every question is appropriate and has a correct answer. It’s almost as bad as believing everything you read on the internet.
Stephen
I truly LOVE this post. There was so much great content in here. I think my favorite point that you made in here was that traditional teaching is still necessary as an educational tool and that we should let technology take over the classroom. I think often times teachers feel overwhelmed with the pressure of using technology in all areas of teaching. In actuality a true blended classrooms uses a mix of traditional teaching and meaningful online experiences. And using the last part of your blog about "How To Know If It's Actually Working" as a guide to determine how effective the learning experiences is will help teachers create a better blended learning environment. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteHi, Charla. Thanks for your kind comments. It’s too easy to get caught up in the flow. There is nothing wrong with asking constructive questions like “why do we need to do this?”
DeleteThanks,
Stephen
Wow Stephen, this post was great!
ReplyDeleteI connected with a lot of the content in this post. One thing that stuck out to me was the Technology Fatigue. I truly love technology. I am fascinated by it, and want to always be the most efficient as possible. However, I do see that as a problem throughout my lessons and across all my fields of study. I see it greatly affecting my life, because I directly teach with programs and techniques on technology that continually change. I see that I have to streamline what programs and technology I want to cover while focusing on a lot external Techniques that seem not to change, even when the technology does.
Thanks for posting awesome ideas!
Hi, Will. Thanks for your kind words. I think the reason that software like Microsoft Word are so successful is because they have evolved over the years. Word has remained relatively unchanged despite going through periodic major upgrades. I bet that if we could introduce Word 2016 to a person from 1995, they would recognize and be able to use the application. It’s all about evolution and support when it comes to apps.
DeleteThanks,
Stephen